Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) Clinical Practice Exam 2025 - Free ASWB Clinical Practice Questions and Study Guide

Question: 1 / 400

A social worker protests against legislation she believes harms clients while not identifying her employer. How are her actions interpreted?

Unethical as she represents her employer

Ethical as she acted as a private individual

The social worker's actions can be interpreted as ethical because she is advocating for a cause that she believes is in the best interest of her clients while maintaining her identity as a private individual. In this context, when a social worker speaks out against legislation or policies that they perceive to be harmful, they are exercising their right to free speech and are fulfilling a professional responsibility to advocate for social justice and the welfare of clients.

According to the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) Code of Ethics, social workers have a responsibility to engage in social and political action and to work to improve the social conditions that affect their clients. By not identifying her employer, the social worker clearly delineates her personal views from her professional role, reducing the risk of her employer's perspective being misrepresented. This distinction is crucial because it allows her to communicate her concerns without implicating her employer in her stance, thereby safeguarding the integrity of her professional relationship.

In this scenario, acting as a private individual while advocating for clients enhances her credibility and aligns with ethical practice in the social work field, as it emphasizes her commitment to client advocacy over institutional loyalties.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Unethical for not obtaining permission

Ethical as she can act in detrimental policy instances

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy